I remembered my first encounter with a digital camera back
in 1999. It was this bulky
Hitachi
model, probably a one mega pixel, using a PCMCIA card as its memory, capable of
recording movies and sound. It was one of the coolest in market (a short-lived
title anyway) and was owned by the Engineering Department of my college, and we
used it to capture our adventure in the solar bike race.
That was seven years ago. Things changed since then. Now you
have 2 mega pixel cameras coolly placed in an ultra slim phone, which is even
capable of broadcasting video conference across the wireless band. Seven years
ago phones with IR ports are few and far between!
And with the introduction of cameras which captures pictures
in digital format and retro fitted in phones, one significant change that is
quite noticeable is the way people communicate in the Internet nowadays. Gone
are the days that you would chat with a faceless face: now you’ll have this
cool option to upload your pictures right from your camera and phone and let
the world know how beautiful or handsome you are. Of course that’s not the case
in every picture, where often the pictures are taken by the person itself. More
of it later.
But oh how Internet porn changed too! Self portraits, voyeur
shots and even small clips of both are rampaging through various sites and
newsletters. Some are voluntary shots, but most of it are off-the-books shots
until the couples breaks up and the guy seemed to be taking the vengeful side
of revenge by distributing the pictures wherever he can (and make some money
too if he’s lucky). Some of the shots even include high profile names that
glazed the local dailies before throngs of lawsuits and press conferences are
made by the party involved, denying any involvement in the action caught by the
lenses. Of course, the word vain was elevated to a deeper meaning then. Good
news for porn lovers, bad for those compromised.
Back to the beautiful/handsome takes. Last millennium it was
rendered unsafe to even chat with somebody over the Internet if you are looking
for a consistent involvement with the person. Of course some get very lucky: I
met a friend through mIRC and we are very good friends until today. But in some
cases, things can get rather ugly because the person who claims to have the Banderas
and Cruise looks actually turns out to have the eye lashes of Banderas and the
two front teeth of Cruise, the rest just falls too short. Even worse is when
these two people meet and that will be the first and last. In some cases it’s
downright dangerous, because bottom line is; trust is a very big issue.
With the emergence of sites like Friendster and MySpace, and
of course the emergence of the Digital Camera Age, things are pretty much
safer. Not safe, but the risk factor is decreased. Of course you still can
forge the pictures, which brings me to the next point.
How many times have you visited Friendster and just out of
boredome, flicked through a few profile and just laughed your heads off upon
seeing their pictures and reading their profile? Self portraits of themselves
in various geeky positions and their profile data that sometimes reads “I’m a
very cool and nice person” can really question your sanity. And that “am I turning
you on?”. Good God, what is this, skin trade?
Coherent with the emergence of an easy way of obtaining
digital pictures are the emergence of photo editing tools. From the easy to use
Print Shop to the highly advanced tools like Adobe Photoshop, you can make
yourself look younger, fairer and pleasing to others by incorporating those
layers of filters that will remove the “deformities” that you find unnecessary for
the world out there to find out. Picture tells a thousand words? Not anymore.
I visited one profile lately. She had tons of self portrait pictures,
and though I’m not a high level expert in photo effects (my experience of
working in an architecture firm is good enough to detect these things), some
things can be discovered without the help of experts. Her pictures are highly
edited, either by giving those layers of effect (including her own make-up
effects of course) and the angle of the pictures and the clothes which can
distract the viewers from the obvious. However she did slip. There are of
course a few group pictures with her “unedited” self, and there you go, all the
other pictures just went from hero to zero. Funny part is throng of guys had
nothing but love and admiration for the edited pictures and that can be seen
from the various comments given. God must have really looked the other way
around when these comments were given (in this case too many times).
It’s quite difficult to see past through these things. Our
human mind doesn’t react well to changes and comparisons, though some of us are
capable of doing it. The Digital Camera age certainly changed things, and of
course there are lots of good things in it, but it could be better if we can
act more civil and responsible rather than abusing it.
I’ll write more when I have the mood, right now I got to go
and puke, because I’ve seen more edited pictures of her!